Alaska Outdoor Supersite: Alaska outdoor information
Home
Site Map
Directory -- Businesses serving the Alaska outdoors industry
Areas -- Information about Alaska outdoor areas
Forum
Fishing -- Information about fishin in Alaska
Hunting -- Information about Alaska hunting
Magazine -- Articles and photos about the Alaska outdoors
Products
Who is OAC?
   
* New on
  OutdoorsDirectory.com
* News & tips by email:
  Alaska Outdoors mailing list
* Email notification of new
  Alaska books and video

 

Terrain Navigator
CD ROM topographic map coverage for ALL of Alaska

 Terrain Navigator 2001

Click for more information


Complete Catalogs

Alaska Hunting Books
Alaska Fishing Books
Alaska Travel Books

Plan Your
Alaska Trip
with The Milepost

The Milepost

Click here for more information or to
order your copy


Hunting forum

The Alaska
Hunting Forum

[ Return to Contents | Post a Reply | Post a new message ]


Yes, but it's nothing new
Posted by B_M on Jan 31 2006
The practice of lying about the unit in which a bear was killed is nothing new, the stakes are just different in this case.  What I'm referring to is the discrepancy in bag limits in varying units.  Some units are one bear every regulatory year, while others are one every 4 years.  There's not much to stop someone from hunting in a 4-year area but claiming the bear was killed in a 1-year area.  It's certainly a different situation with the selling of hides, but not a new practice if people do indeed lie about where it was killed.

Previous: control units? twodux Jan 31 2006
Next: selling BRWNBR Jan 31 2006

Message Thread:


Post a Reply

Posting to this forum is now disabled. Please visit our new forums


Alaska outdoors ~ home | Areas | Magazine | Directory | Alaska outdoors forums | Alaska boating
Alaska hunting | Alaska fishing | Alaska Outdoors Store | Site Map | About Us

© 1996 Outdoors America Communications
PO Box 609-W, Delta Junction, AK 99737
Tel. (907) 895-4919

forums@outdoorsdirectory.com