Alaska Outdoor Supersite: Alaska outdoor information
Home
Site Map
Directory -- Businesses serving the Alaska outdoors industry
Areas -- Information about Alaska outdoor areas
Forum
Fishing -- Information about fishin in Alaska
Hunting -- Information about Alaska hunting
Magazine -- Articles and photos about the Alaska outdoors
Products
Who is OAC?
   
* New on
  OutdoorsDirectory.com
* News & tips by email:
  Alaska Outdoors mailing list
* Email notification of new
  Alaska books and video

 

Terrain Navigator
CD ROM topographic map coverage for ALL of Alaska

 Terrain Navigator 2001

Click for more information


Complete Catalogs

Alaska Hunting Books
Alaska Fishing Books
Alaska Travel Books

Plan Your
Alaska Trip
with The Milepost

The Milepost

Click here for more information or to
order your copy


Hunting forum

The Alaska
Hunting Forum

[ Return to Contents | Post a Reply | Post a new message ]


okay...
Posted by bushrat on Jan 31 2006
375,

Never got an email from you. A lot of us are more involved in things than you probably realize. Certainly agree that we should become involved if we feel strongly about it. You and I are on opposite poles, I think, as to what should be done, and how. A lot of the new proposals really tick me off, anger me, disappoint me, and really just make me want to crawl in a hole and forget there even is an outside world where politician-appointed board members may decide the future of hunting in Alaska. I'm fairly certain I'd love most of the proposals you hate, and vice versa. Intensive Management Law on the whole will in my opinion eventually hurt us all and hurt hunting. We try to say that the aerial wolf control isn't "hunting" (and it isn't) and that we should distance ourselves from saying it and others using it (it's "aerial shooting" really or "aerial control") and yet all these proposals on the books for things like "same-day airborne hunting" of grizzlies, "hunting" of wolves and bears from snowmachines...in the end it just brings hunting down. Hunters are killing hunting. That's the truth of it, the way I see it. The only possible way Intensive Management objectives will ever be met and sustained is with continual predator control of wolves and bears. I just don't see that as a good viable option for us. Pretty soon, "aerial shooting" of wolves really will be "hunting" from an airplane in the mind of the public. "Same day airborne hunting" of bears, same thing. "Hunting" wolves and bears from a snowmachine, running them down...ah yes, all part of "hunting." You can have it--but I will continue to denounce it. Right now some are trying to say that these are just temporary drastic measures we need to use to solve the dilemma of not enough moose and caribou. But seriously looking at, and seeing the new proposals for 2006-1011 predator control in other units, and even in the same units we now have predator control going on...it seems clear that we're going to put ourselves in a place where all these programs are continuously ongoing in one form or another. Some say, "Great!" Others, like me, say...well I can't say it here.

So what is the proposal # you are concerned with <grin>?

Previous: berating 375ultramag Jan 30 2006
Next: Bushrat 375ultramag Jan 31 2006

Message Thread:


Post a Reply

Posting to this forum is now disabled. Please visit our new forums


Alaska outdoors ~ home | Areas | Magazine | Directory | Alaska outdoors forums | Alaska boating
Alaska hunting | Alaska fishing | Alaska Outdoors Store | Site Map | About Us

© 1996 Outdoors America Communications
PO Box 609-W, Delta Junction, AK 99737
Tel. (907) 895-4919

forums@outdoorsdirectory.com